| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Wood <dwood(at)salesforce(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression |
| Date: | 2013-12-18 15:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20131218153902.GC11006@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> I have to say, it makes me really uncomfortable to take such
> shortcuts. In other branches we are doing liveliness checks with
> MultiXactIdIsRunning() et al. Why isn't that necessary here? And how
> likely is that this won't cause breakage somewhere down the line because
> somebody doesn't know of that subtlety?
I came up with the attached last night, which should do the right thing
in both cases.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| danwood-bug-2.patch | text/x-diff | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-12-18 16:05:27 | Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-18 15:17:46 | Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit |