| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time-Delayed Standbys |
| Date: | 2013-12-04 14:01:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20131204140159.GL24801@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2013-12-03 19:33:16 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > - compute recoveryUntilDelayTime in XLOG_XACT_COMMIT and
> > XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_COMPACT checks
>
> Why just those? Why not aborts and restore points also?
What would the advantage of waiting on anything but commits be? If it's
not a commit, the action won't change the state of the database (yesyes,
there are exceptions, but those don't have a timestamp)...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitsumasa KONDO | 2013-12-04 14:02:03 | Re: Time-Delayed Standbys |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-12-04 14:01:32 | Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists |