Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?
Date: 2013-11-26 19:34:54
Message-ID: 20131126193454.GJ14681@crankycanuck.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:18:58PM -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
> Using self-signed certs you can give them longevity of 10+ years, so never
> have to worry about them again :)

Unless of course you turn out to have a weak algorithm and, say, No
Such Agency decides to take up residence on your network. (It's not
clear that CAs are any protection against that either, though, of
course.) In general, 10+ years is probably too short a time to be
using a cert unless you are completely certain to whom it could be
exposed. (Some would argue that if you had that certainty, you might
not need TLS/SSL anyway. I guess I'd respond that you could use TLS
anyway because it would help in case of a network compromise.)

Best,

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rysdam 2013-11-26 19:43:42 having difficulty with explain analyze output
Previous Message Vick Khera 2013-11-26 19:18:58 Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?