Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Richard Neill <rn214(at)richardneill(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, postgresql(at)richardneill(dot)org, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs
Date: 2013-10-10 23:14:32
Message-ID: 20131010231432.GA7092@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:05:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The changes shown below are incorrect, I think.
>
>
> On 10/2/13 12:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > *************** gen_salt(type text [, iter_count integer
> > *** 353,359 ****
> > <entry>12 years</entry>
> > </row>
> > <row>
> > ! <entry><literal>md5</></entry>
> > <entry>2345086</entry>
> > <entry>1 day</entry>
> > <entry>3 years</entry>
> > --- 358,364 ----
> > <entry>12 years</entry>
> > </row>
> > <row>
> > ! <entry><literal>md5 hash</></entry>

Uh, the table already has a mention of md5 crypt above:

<entry><literal>crypt-md5</></entry>

How can the later entry not be MD5 hash?

> > <entry>2345086</entry>
> > <entry>1 day</entry>
> > <entry>3 years</entry>
> > *************** gen_salt(type text [, iter_count integer
> > *** 380,386 ****
> > </listitem>
> > <listitem>
> > <para>
> > ! <literal>md5</> numbers are from mdcrack 1.2.
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
> > <listitem>
> > --- 385,391 ----
> > </listitem>
> > <listitem>
> > <para>
> > ! <literal>md5 hash</> numbers are from mdcrack 1.2.
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
> > <listitem>
> > *************** gen_random_bytes(count integer) returns
> > *** 1343,1349 ****
> > <entry>OpenBSD sys/crypto</entry>
> > </row>
> > <row>
> > ! <entry>MD5 and SHA1</entry>
> > <entry>WIDE Project</entry>
> > <entry>KAME kame/sys/crypto</entry>
> > </row>
> > --- 1348,1354 ----
> > <entry>OpenBSD sys/crypto</entry>
> > </row>
> > <row>
> > ! <entry>MD5 hash and SHA1</entry>
> > <entry>WIDE Project</entry>
> > <entry>KAME kame/sys/crypto</entry>
> > </row>
>

Again, "MD5 crypt" is mentioned in the same table above:

<entry>MD5 crypt</entry>

so how can this not be md5 hash?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 'Bruce Momjian' 2013-10-10 23:15:46 Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function
Previous Message Dwayne Towell 2013-10-10 23:10:35 Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function