| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Richard Neill <rn214(at)richardneill(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, postgresql(at)richardneill(dot)org, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs |
| Date: | 2013-10-11 00:22:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1381450950.5264.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 19:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The changes shown below are incorrect, I think.
> >
> >
> > On 10/2/13 12:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > *************** gen_salt(type text [, iter_count integer
> > > *** 353,359 ****
> > > <entry>12 years</entry>
> > > </row>
> > > <row>
> > > ! <entry><literal>md5</></entry>
> > > <entry>2345086</entry>
> > > <entry>1 day</entry>
> > > <entry>3 years</entry>
> > > --- 358,364 ----
> > > <entry>12 years</entry>
> > > </row>
> > > <row>
> > > ! <entry><literal>md5 hash</></entry>
>
> Uh, the table already has a mention of md5 crypt above:
>
> <entry><literal>crypt-md5</></entry>
>
> How can the later entry not be MD5 hash?
Because what you pass to the functions is 'md5', not 'md5 hash', which
is what the new text appears to indicate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-10-11 00:32:32 | Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs |
| Previous Message | 'Bruce Momjian' | 2013-10-10 23:15:46 | Re: BUG #8516: Calling VOLATILE from STABLE function |