Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Date: 2013-09-13 16:43:05
Message-ID: 20130913164305.GS2706@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* Patrick Dung (patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk) wrote:
> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.

What? That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work. In
general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
it's certainly not required.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Noel 2013-09-13 16:47:34 Re: Small PosgreSQL locking function request - with bounty
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2013-09-13 16:29:14 Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL