Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

From: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Date: 2013-09-13 17:04:32
Message-ID: 1379091872.8613.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

________________________________
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>; Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

* Patrick Dung (patrick_dkt(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)hk) wrote:
>> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.

>What?  That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work.  In
>general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
>it's certainly not required.

I mean the old version and new version would need to take up disk space on the server.
Thus roughly doubled the disk space used.

Thanks,
Patrick

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Dung 2013-09-13 17:08:37 Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Previous Message Jay Vee 2013-09-13 16:57:07 trigger or logging