Re: Proposal: leave a hint when switching logging away from stderr

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: leave a hint when switching logging away from stderr
Date: 2013-08-10 16:35:39
Message-ID: 20130810163539.GA478266@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:57:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does that ameliorate your concern, or do you still want it to be DEBUG1?
>
> > I think of the "implicit sequence" messages we moved from NOTICE to DEBUG1
> > somewhat recently. No doubt those messages had helped at times, but they
> > didn't quite carry their weight at NOTICE. My gut prediction is that this
> > will fall in that same utility range. But you make a valid point about noise
> > in the startup log being easier to discount.
>
> Well, we can certainly back off the messages' log level if we get
> complaints. But I think the argument for this patch being useful
> is a great deal stronger if it's allowed to operate by default.

True enough. Your plan makes sense to me now; thanks.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Tipton 2013-08-10 18:30:01 Re: BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection(NULL, ...) doesn't work
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-08-10 16:31:25 Re: Proposal for XML Schema Validation