Re: Proposal for XML Schema Validation

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: "Kodamasimham Pridhvi (MT2012066)" <Pridhvi(dot)Kodamasimham(at)iiitb(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bisen Vikrantsingh Mohansingh MT2012036 <BisenVikrantsingh(dot)Mohansingh(at)iiitb(dot)org>, "rc(at)iiitb(dot)ac(dot)in" <rc(at)iiitb(dot)ac(dot)in>
Subject: Re: Proposal for XML Schema Validation
Date: 2013-08-10 16:31:25
Message-ID: 20130810163125.GA478418@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:42:11AM +0000, Kodamasimham Pridhvi (MT2012066) wrote:
> With reference to "Add XML Schema validation and xmlvalidate functions (SQL:2008)" in ToDo list, we have gone through pgsql-mailing list but we didn't find any significant work in this area, so we are proposing our own model for xml schema validation . please kindly go through it and let us know how can we improve it.Please find the attached proposal document.

Note that PostgreSQL 8.3 had xmlvalidate() for a time; commit
3bf822c4d722d6245a65abdd2502a9d26ab990d5 removed it due to security problems.
A new implementation (or revamp of the old) must avoid reintroducing those
vulnerabilities. Similar considerations apply to XML Schema.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-08-10 16:35:39 Re: Proposal: leave a hint when switching logging away from stderr
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2013-08-10 16:30:45 Re: killing pg_dump leaves backend process