Re: Implementing incremental backup

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing incremental backup
Date: 2013-06-19 21:20:21
Message-ID: 20130619212021.GV23363@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Claudio Freire (klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I don't see how this is better than snapshotting at the filesystem
> level. I have no experience with TB scale databases (I've been limited
> to only hundreds of GB), but from my limited mid-size db experience,
> filesystem snapshotting is pretty much the same thing you propose
> there (xfs_freeze), and it works pretty well. There's even automated
> tools to do that, like bacula, and they can handle incremental
> snapshots.

Large databases tend to have multiple filesystems and getting a single,
consistent, snapshot across all of them while under load is..
'challenging'. It's fine if you use pg_start/stop_backup() and you're
saving the XLOGs off, but if you can't do that..

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-06-19 21:50:07 Re: Git-master regression failure
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2013-06-19 21:01:28 Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib