From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Running pgindent |
Date: | 2013-05-29 22:21:30 |
Message-ID: | 20130529222130.GB5635@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
>
> > Done. This was the first run of the Perl-based pgindent script. There
> > was a lot of code churn in this run as the paragraphs are slightly
> > wider. Also, I saw some outdenting of long lines, rather than allowing
> > them to go past 80 characters, but it seemed minimal. If others see
> > problems, we can adjust the script and run it again.
>
> It seems a bit troubling to me that the underlying indent binary seems
> to have behaved slightly different. I think this will cause problems
> down the road when we try to backpatch stuff that has been indented
> differently on the older branches.
Well, we have to figure out why it is behaving differently. If I had to
guess it would be that the parameters to BSD indent were somehow
different, though I thought Andrew copied them directly.
> I wonder if it would be best to inflict pgindent with the new script upon
> the old active branches as well, to avoid this problem. (It might cause
> other problems, of course.)
Wow, uh, yeah, I guess we could do that. I will await more feedback.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2013-05-29 22:31:18 | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-29 21:56:32 | Re: Running pgindent |