| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make fast promotion the default promotion mode. |
| Date: | 2013-05-02 00:25:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20130502002509.GF23387@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 07:23:33PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Heikki said "...remove pg_ctl -m fast/smart option altogether. There
> > is no need to expose that to users."
> >
> > So it is no longer exposed to users. If there are others that share
> > that opinion we may change this.
>
> /me blinks.
>
> I'm not sure we truly need two types of promotion. But if we do, it
> makes no sense to me to have it and not allow users to select the one
> they want.
I am also confused why we would have two promotion modes. Either the
default mode works, or it doesn't, and we fix it. If there is enough
concern that fast promotion will not work, should we remove that
ability?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KONDO Mitsumasa | 2013-05-02 04:30:13 | Re: pgsql: Install recycled WAL segments with current timeline ID during re |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-05-01 23:23:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make fast promotion the default promotion mode. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-05-02 00:36:42 | Re: Proposal to add --single-row to psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-01 23:37:07 | Re: high io BUT huge amount of free memory |