| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joshua Berry <yoberi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Segmentation fault with core dump |
| Date: | 2013-04-10 23:21:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20130410232131.GD7547@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2013-04-10 19:06:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > (Wanders away wondering just how much the regression tests exercise
> > holdable cursors.)
>
> And the answer is they're not testing this code path at all, because if
> you do
> DECLARE c CURSOR WITH HOLD FOR ...
> FETCH ALL FROM c;
> then the second query executes with a portal (and resource owner)
> created to execute the FETCH command, not directly on the held portal.
But in that path CurrentResourceOwner gets reset to portal->resowner as
well (see PortalRunFetch())?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-10 23:22:57 | Re: Segmentation fault with core dump |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-04-10 23:13:58 | Re: Segmentation fault with core dump |