Re: Segmentation fault with core dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Berry <yoberi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault with core dump
Date: 2013-04-10 23:06:12
Message-ID: 13081.1365635172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I wrote:
> (Wanders away wondering just how much the regression tests exercise
> holdable cursors.)

And the answer is they're not testing this code path at all, because if
you do
DECLARE c CURSOR WITH HOLD FOR ...
FETCH ALL FROM c;
then the second query executes with a portal (and resource owner)
created to execute the FETCH command, not directly on the held portal.

After a little bit of thought I'm not sure it's even possible to
reproduce this problem with libpq, because it doesn't expose any way to
issue a bare protocol Execute command against a pre-existing portal.
(I had thought psqlOBC went through libpq, but maybe it's playing some
games here.)

Anyway, I'm thinking the appropriate fix might be like this

- CurrentResourceOwner = portal->resowner;
+ if (portal->resowner)
+ CurrentResourceOwner = portal->resowner;

in several places in pquery.c; that is, keep using
TopTransactionResourceOwner if the portal doesn't have its own.

A more general but probably much more invasive solution would be to fake
up an intermediate portal when pulling data from a held portal, to
more closely approximate the explicit-FETCH case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-04-10 23:13:58 Re: Segmentation fault with core dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-10 22:35:18 Re: Segmentation fault with core dump