Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: 2012-09-24 14:31:04
Message-ID: 20120924143104.GD21242@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:13:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>> I can confirm that pg_upgrade does case-insensitive comparisons of
> >>> encoding/locale names:
>
> > Or we could just remove dashes from the name before comparisons.
>
> That would merely move the breakage somewhere else. I think you are
> already assuming far too much about the OS' interpretation of locale
> names by assuming they are case-insensitive. Assuming that dashes
> aren't significant seems 100% wrong.
>
> FWIW, what I found out last time I touched this code is that on many
> systems setlocale doesn't bother to return a canonicalized spelling;
> it just gives back the string you gave it. It might be worth doing
> what Peter suggests, just to be consistent with what we are doing
> elsewhere, but I'm not sure how much it will help.

This comment in initdb.c doesn't sound hopeful:

* If successful, and canonname isn't NULL, a malloc'd copy of the locale's
* canonical name is stored there. This is especially useful for figuring out
* what locale name "" means (ie, the environment value). (Actually,
* it seems that on most implementations that's the only thing it's good for;
* we could wish that setlocale gave back a canonically spelled version of
* the locale name, but typically it doesn't.)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 14:38:51 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-24 14:26:59 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 14:38:51 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-24 14:26:59 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed