Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: 2012-09-15 18:06:03
Message-ID: 20120915180603.GA20907@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:40:06AM +0800, Rural Hunter wrote:
> >>>The check is to make sure that once we have created all the user schema
> >>>details in the new cluster, that there are the same number of objects in
> >>>the new and old databases.
> >>>
> >>>Obviously there are a different number in your case here, but I don't
> >>>know why those would be different, and in fact, because we have never
> >>>hit this, there isn't even any debug output that shows the source of the
> >>>difference.
> >>>
> >>>If I send you a patch can you compile it and send back the debug output
> >>>it produces?
> >>>
> >>Yes sure, I will try to compile and retest with it.
> >Actually, I have a simpler idea. At the point where it fails, you can
> >run pg_dump --schema-only on the testdb database in the old and new
> >cluster and then diff those output files and email the result to us; it
> >should show the mismatch. I am not sure if the dumps will output the
> >objects in the same order, it might.
> >
> diff attached.

OK, I see many new ALTER TABLE commands, but nothing that would cause a
difference in relation count.

Attached is a patch that will return the OID of the old/new mismatched
entries. Please research the pg_class objects on the old/new clusters
that have the mismatch and let me know. It might be something that
isn't in the old cluster, or not in the new cluster.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 584 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rural Hunter 2012-09-16 04:38:37 Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message F. BROUARD / SQLpro 2012-09-15 10:16:09 PostGIS install fail on 64 bits Windows Seven system

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2012-09-15 18:44:19 Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-15 17:21:44 Re: embedded list v2