Re: MMAP Buffers

From: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MMAP Buffers
Date: 2011-04-17 20:09:24
Message-ID: 201104172209.24587.rsmogura@softperience.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> Sunday 17 April 2011 20:02:11
> On Sunday 17 April 2011 19:26:31 Radosław Smogura wrote:
> > Kernel merges vm_structs. So mappings are compacted. I'm not kernel
> > specialist, but skipping memory consumption, for not compacted mappings,
> > kernel uses btrees for dealing with TLB, so it should not matter if
> > there is 100 vm_structs or 100000 vm_structs.
>
> But the CPUs TLB cache has maybe 16/256 (1lvl, 2nd) to 64/512 entries. That
> will mean that there will be cachemisses all over.
> Additionally your scheme requires flushing it regularly...
>
> Andres

I only know Phenom has 4096 entries I think and this covers 16MB of memory.
But I was taking about memory usage of struct vm_struct in kernel. I tries as
well with huge pages, but I can't write really fast allocator for this, it's
slower then malloc, maybe from different reasons.

Regards,
Radek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2011-04-17 20:24:07 Re: MMAP Buffers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-17 20:09:19 Re: ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations