| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |
| Date: | 2011-03-30 19:39:05 |
| Message-ID: | 201103301939.p2UJd5403598@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-03-30 at 10:57 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Also, I am unclear if this is really our bug. At least one of the
> > systems was on Ubuntu/Debian, and they might both have been, and I know
> > Debian changes our source code. Where can I find a copy of the diffs
> > they have made?
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/debian-9.0/files/head:/debian/patches/
These all seem reasonable, but I am confused by this. Someone reported
last week that the equals sign is not optional in postgreql.conf on
Debian but I don't see that patch in here. Also I thought they modified
pg_hba.conf in some odd way. Are these changes no longer made in 9.0?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-30 19:42:19 | Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-03-30 19:35:42 | Re: Process local hint bit cache |