From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |
Date: | 2011-03-30 21:25:39 |
Message-ID: | 1301520339.31317.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2011-03-30 at 15:39 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On ons, 2011-03-30 at 10:57 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Also, I am unclear if this is really our bug. At least one of the
> > > systems was on Ubuntu/Debian, and they might both have been, and I know
> > > Debian changes our source code. Where can I find a copy of the diffs
> > > they have made?
> >
> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/debian-9.0/files/head:/debian/patches/
>
> These all seem reasonable, but I am confused by this. Someone reported
> last week that the equals sign is not optional in postgreql.conf on
> Debian but I don't see that patch in here.
That's probably because some other tool processes to the configuration
file to find the data directory or something.
> Also I thought they modified
> pg_hba.conf in some odd way. Are these changes no longer made in 9.0?
I think that was about 10 years ago.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-30 21:27:05 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-03-30 20:58:33 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? |