Tom Lane wrote:
> Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings.
>
> Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real
> risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other
> volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt.
I assume you saw my comment in basebackup.c:
* Some old compilers, e.g. gcc 2.95.3/x86, think that passing
* a struct in the same function as a longjump might clobber
* a variable. bjm 2011-02-04
* http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2003/Dec//msg00051.html
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +