| From: | fluca1978 at infinito(dot)it (Luca Ferrari) |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Subject: | [Pljava-dev] pljava @ itpug (italy) 2010 |
| Date: | 2010-12-13 14:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | 201012131559.00982.fluca1978@infinito.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pljava-dev |
On Monday, December 13, 2010 03:26:42 pm Thomas Hallgren's cat walking on the
keyboard wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> Wouldn't it be better to manage distributed transactions in the middle tier
> on top of it all? After all, you are already *in* a transaction when you
> execute your PL/Java code and that's a transaction that you cannot connect
> other resources to.
>
> When writing PL/Java, I did not intend for distributed transactions to be
> orchestrated from within it for sure. That's not a recommended use-case.
> In fact, I would strongly advice against it.
So did I! And this is what I answered, but I was curious to know if it was
correct at all.
Thanks,
Luca
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Krzysztof | 2010-12-13 16:45:18 | [Pljava-dev] Returning complex complex objects |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2010-12-13 14:26:42 | [Pljava-dev] pljava @ itpug (italy) 2010 |