Re: wCTE behaviour

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wCTE behaviour
Date: 2010-12-08 21:33:53
Message-ID: 20101208213353.GB14085@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:23:59PM +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 2010-12-08 10:19 AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> >>So this patch was marked "Ready for Committer", but a) no committer
> >>has picked it up yet and b) Marko has made changes here that nobody
> >>else has tested out yet that I've seen on the last. Accordingly,
> >>that classification may have been optimistic. It seems to me that
> >>another testing run-through from someone like David might be
> >>appropriate to build some confidence this latest patch should be a
> >>commit candidate. If there is a committer intending to work on this
> >>as-is, they haven't identified themselves.
> >
> >I've tested this one and not managed to break it. One thing it could
> >use is support for EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
>
> What's wrong with EXPLAIN ANALYZE? Here's what I see:

Oops!

I am terribly sorry. It was an earlier patch I didn't manage to
break. I've tried all the same things on this one, and no breakage so
far.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-12-08 21:41:44 Re: pl/python improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-08 21:18:37 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes