| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
| Date: | 2010-08-06 22:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20100806223902.GQ11611@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:48:58PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with
> > complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one
> > advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can
> > use a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value,
> > I can use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort
> > or readability for example a Perl's hash tables.
>
> Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)
When's that going into the tree?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-08-06 22:49:58 | Re: Update hstore % Doc |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-06 22:38:22 | Re: Update hstore % Doc |