Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date: 2010-08-06 20:48:58
Message-ID: 1281127738.2563.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with
> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one
> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use
> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can
> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or
> readability for example a Perl's hash tables.

Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-06 20:49:07 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-06 20:45:58 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch