| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Server load statistics |
| Date: | 2010-07-26 10:47:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20100726104753.GG7584@samason.me.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> I need statistics about the PG server load. At the moment, I use
> for this
>
> SELECT tup_returned + tup_fetched + tup_inserted + tup_updated +
> tup_deleted FROM pg_stat_database WHERE datname='mydb';
>
> However, the figures are absurdly high (> 100.000 rows per second).
> If a "row" is one dataset (one user account, one blog entry, one
> comment etc), I expect two or three orders of magnitude less. Is my
> SQL statement nevertheless a good way to measure how busy the server
> is?
Yes, but I don't think it's measuring what you think it is.
"tup_returned" gives the number of tuples read during sequential scans,
so you've probably got some queries that are touching many more rows
than you're expecting.
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2010-07-26 11:43:08 | Re: What to do if space for database decrease and no additional hard drive is possible? |
| Previous Message | AlannY | 2010-07-26 10:43:47 | What to do if space for database decrease and no additional hard drive is possible? |