| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
| Date: | 2010-07-16 16:04:47 |
| Message-ID: | 201007161604.o6GG4lM11754@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> > Joy! :) Nice patch Robert.
>
> Indeed.
>
> What are the implications for pg_upgrade? Will a database with values
> created before the patch continue to work after the patch has been
> applied (as happened with the new hstore in 9.0), or will pg_upgrade
> need to be taught how to upgrade the old storage format?
Robert told me the old format continues to work in the upgraded
databases.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-07-16 16:06:21 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-07-16 16:04:01 | Re: SHOW TABLES |