| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
| Date: | 2010-07-16 16:06:21 |
| Message-ID: | 0A1801D5-ABDC-4EBF-A331-2F02B87612B9@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 16, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What are the implications for pg_upgrade? Will a database with values
>> created before the patch continue to work after the patch has been
>> applied (as happened with the new hstore in 9.0), or will pg_upgrade
>> need to be taught how to upgrade the old storage format?
>
> Robert told me the old format continues to work in the upgraded
> databases.
Awesome. rhaas++
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-07-16 16:09:53 | Re: SHOW TABLES |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-07-16 16:04:47 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |