Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date: 2010-04-19 21:47:15
Message-ID: 20100419214715.GO6733@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs escribió:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > Oh. Then I'm confused. Tom said: "as of 9.0, it's necessary to
> > connect to some database in order to proceed with auth checking". Why
> > is that necessary
>
> It's not, I just explained how to do it without.

You mean purely using pg_hba.conf "all" rules? That seems a bit
unsatisfactory ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-19 21:48:56 Re: shared_buffers documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-19 21:36:36 Re: shared_buffers documentation