Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date: 2010-04-19 21:22:37
Message-ID: 1271712157.8305.20358.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> Oh. Then I'm confused. Tom said: "as of 9.0, it's necessary to
> connect to some database in order to proceed with auth checking". Why
> is that necessary

It's not, I just explained how to do it without.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-19 21:27:39 Privileges
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-04-19 21:12:31 Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection