Re: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch
Date: 2010-02-05 20:27:01
Message-ID: 201002052027.o15KR1s00511@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:11 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> It'd probably be worth changing the order of the ApplySetting calls so
> >> that it doesn't look suspicious.
>
> > Just a comment would be enough I think
>
> Yeah. Changing the order would mean that we'd do extra work applying
> and then removing conflicting settings. But the general principle here
> is that GUC settings coming from different places are resolved by
> source priority, not order of execution.

C comment patch attached and applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 738 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-05 20:29:45 Re: plperl db access documentation enhancement
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-05 20:18:22 Re: plperl db access documentation enhancement