Re: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch
Date: 2010-02-02 00:02:45
Message-ID: 19445.1265068965@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:11 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> It'd probably be worth changing the order of the ApplySetting calls so
>> that it doesn't look suspicious.

> Just a comment would be enough I think

Yeah. Changing the order would mean that we'd do extra work applying
and then removing conflicting settings. But the general principle here
is that GUC settings coming from different places are resolved by
source priority, not order of execution.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-02 00:09:12 Re: Make TOAST_TUPLES_PER_PAGE configurable per table.
Previous Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2010-02-01 23:57:21 Re: development setup and libdir