From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Mammoth in Core? |
Date: | 2010-01-25 03:33:48 |
Message-ID: | 20100125123348.9158.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> "splitting existing projects into some 'modules', and getting the
> modules one by one into core" was not the concluion, actually.
>
> For example, see below from above URL: This means that we expect
> PostgreSQL exports it's parser so that existing cluster softwares can
> use it. Not opposite direction.
I think they says the same practically -- at least have the same impact.
It says postgres need to export the the internal feature *only for* some
of external cluster softwares. So, if you are thinking about exporting
some features from the core, the exported features would better to be
stable enough and shared by several third-party tools.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-25 04:45:58 | Re: Mammoth in Core? |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-01-25 03:16:34 | Re: RADIUS authentication |