Re: Mammoth in Core?

> On 1/19/10 9:28 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> > Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
> >> The conclusion is splitting existing projects into some 'modules',
> >> and getting the modules one by one into core. Voted features are here:
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ClusterFeatures

"splitting existing projects into some 'modules', and getting the
modules one by one into core" was not the concluion, actually.

For example, see below from above URL: This means that we expect
PostgreSQL exports it's parser so that existing cluster softwares can
use it. Not opposite direction.

> API into the Parser / Parser as an independent module
>
> * just first step, before going to the catalog
> * statement based replication need to reply certain constructs with CONSTAnT values you provide
> * Figure out which you need to replace... quite difficult
> * but if we have the plan, could do better
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

> > This page was a bit messy for someone who didn't attend the meeting to
> > follow. I just cleaned it up so that the features are listed in voting
> > order, and to have more inter-page links. It's better, but could use
> > some more work still.
>
> Yeah, we'll be cleaning it up and fleshing it out more from now until pgCon.
>
> --Josh Berkus
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers