| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES |
| Date: | 2009-10-05 01:35:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20091005102937.9CD6.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Recently, I encountered a situation where the docs on (or impl?)
> INCLUDING INDEXES and INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS are not clearly defined
> for primary keys. Should it be noted in the docs that in this case, we
> are referring to the technical implementation of a primary key, i.e. a
> unique index and a not null constraint, thus both conditions are
> required?
It might be a confusable feature, but it should be discussed separated
from this patch. IMO, almost all user will use "INCLUDING ALL"
if the syntax is added by the patch.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-05 01:37:45 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
| Previous Message | Dan Colish | 2009-10-05 01:24:19 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |