Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data
Date: 2009-04-21 19:47:22
Message-ID: 20090421194722.GU10358@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hmm Interestingly OSM have just switched from MySQL to PostgreSQL.
>
> On the news blog page it mentioned switching to MonetDB. I saw
> nothing about pgsql there. Do they store it in pgsql for manipulation
> then export to MonetDB?

That's the April 1st news though ... the real news is here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6#Database_improvements

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-21 20:09:08 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2009-04-21 19:38:49 Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-21 20:09:08 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2009-04-21 19:38:49 Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data