| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| Date: | 2009-04-21 19:38:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20090421193849.GE8123@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
* Scott Marlowe (scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Peter Childs <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hmm Interestingly OSM have just switched from MySQL to PostgreSQL.
>
> On the news blog page it mentioned switching to MonetDB. I saw
> nothing about pgsql there. Do they store it in pgsql for manipulation
> then export to MonetDB?
Err, why do I get the feeling that the date on the post wrt MonetDB and
cherokee might play some role?
Based on the wiki, they're using PG 8.3 now (as of April 2009, which
does seem rather recent) and it replaced MySQL.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/smaug
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Servers/db
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-21 19:47:22 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-04-21 19:26:11 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-21 19:47:22 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL for GPS Data |
| Previous Message | Robert Morton | 2009-04-21 19:34:12 | Re: round behavior differs between 8.1.5 and 8.3.7 |