From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |
Date: | 2009-03-04 21:24:39 |
Message-ID: | 20090304162439.cafdc5bb.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
In response to Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> I assume you'll be putting in the weeks/months of work required to fix
> >> pgAdmin & phpPgAdmin which would be far better spent on new features
> >> than uglifying the code in far nastier ways than the current state of
> >> the catalogs?
> >
> > *Shrug* long term consistency is the better choice.
>
> Easy to say if you're not one of the people for whom such a change
> would mean weeks of recoding
Don't those folks have to tweak their code with each new release anyway?
Because those tables are constantly changing? I know we hit problems
with the way triggers are stored in 8.3 compared to earlier versions.
Granted, a sweeping change will necessitate a much larger tweak than
a few changed columns, but the long-term benefit should be cleaner
client code.
> Besides - what percentage of users ever go anywhere near the
> catalogs? I'd guess a fraction of a percent of users, and maybe 1 - 5%
> of developers.
You could always take a survey ... bosses love surveys ...
I, for one, know of lots of code that I've written that accesses those
catalogs. I can't speak for other people.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-04 21:27:50 | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-03-04 21:23:17 | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |