| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: binary array and record recv |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 12:51:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200901271451.54440.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 14:07:26 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote:
> > Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto
> > rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older
> > view's behavior.
>
> We extend properties of objects all the time. That is why we make new
> releases. No one is required to use the new properties.
>
> Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version
> are not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving
> the older table's behavior?
This curiously came through with a wrong subject. The point had already been
made, though.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-27 13:13:27 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-01-27 12:47:29 | Re: Compiler warnings fix |