Re: binary array and record recv

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: binary array and record recv
Date: 2009-01-27 12:07:26
Message-ID: 200901271407.27657.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote:
> Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto
> rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older
> view's behavior.

We extend properties of objects all the time. That is why we make new
releases. No one is required to use the new properties.

Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version are
not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving the
older table's behavior?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-01-27 12:18:31 Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-01-27 12:06:48 [PATCH] Space reservation v02