| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Date: | 2009-01-25 21:20:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20090125212000.GB4138@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> The main question in my mind is whether we should have a turn-off
> feature that is global (GUC) or per-view (reloption). One difficulty
> with a reloption is that there's no way to set it on a view until after
> you've done CREATE VIEW, whereupon it's too late --- the auto rules
> are already there, and surely the reloption mechanism isn't going to
> know how to make them go away.
Hmm, is there no way to do CREATE VIEW ... WITH (reloption)? Isn't it
just a matter of another case in opt_check_option?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-01-25 21:40:34 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Previous Message | User Achernow | 2009-01-25 19:57:59 | libpqtypes - libpqtypes: fix a few compiler warnings |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2009-01-25 21:32:00 | Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) |
| Previous Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-01-25 20:11:15 | Re: Table Partitioning Feature |