From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
Date: | 2008-10-28 20:36:15 |
Message-ID: | 20081028203615.GI4912@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Doing nothing until release is certainly not an option ;-). But AFAICS
> > >> this is not a showstopper for development so I was intending to wait
> > >> until commitfest starts before doing anything with it.
> >
> > > Just uncomfortable leaving known bugs in the tree, that's all.
> >
> > Feel free to stick something about it on the open items list
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items
> > if you want to make doubly sure it's not forgotten about.
>
> You're pulling my chain.
:-)
The new entry seems too vague to be useful ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-28 20:49:52 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-28 20:32:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-10-28 20:44:46 | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-28 20:32:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby. |