Re: PostgreSQL future ideas

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Date: 2008-09-19 20:37:16
Message-ID: 20080919163716.93804613.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:57:36 +0100
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> > Has there been any idea to port PG to a more modern programming language
> > like C++? Of course there are some minor obstacles like a new OO design,
>
> The plan is to start porting it to Java after the next release -
> probably at the beginning of April.

I don't think that we should rush into any one language without
checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything
to Intercal.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-09-19 20:38:35 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2008-09-19 20:32:50 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-09-19 20:38:35 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2008-09-19 20:32:50 Re: PostgreSQL future ideas