From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Date: | 2008-09-20 10:47:10 |
Message-ID: | 1221907630.3585.1.camel@huvostro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:37 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:57:36 +0100
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> > > Has there been any idea to port PG to a more modern programming language
> > > like C++? Of course there are some minor obstacles like a new OO design,
> >
> > The plan is to start porting it to Java after the next release -
> > probably at the beginning of April.
>
> I don't think that we should rush into any one language without
> checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything
> to Intercal.
We should rewrite it to something that has no visual noise, so
attracting new developers would be easier.
My choice would be whitespace , see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language)
-----------------
Hannu Krosing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2008-09-20 13:06:31 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Previous Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2008-09-20 09:05:11 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2008-09-20 13:06:31 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2008-09-20 09:07:25 | Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep) |