| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Archived-At message header |
| Date: | 2008-06-18 14:20:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20080618142003.GD5077@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
> could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
> thread back up. Maybe it's a dumb idea, though. (Nobody would accuse
> me of never having dumb ideas in public.)
I've also thought about this in the past. I don't think it's a dumb
idea -- perhaps it can be made to work. I'm hesitant to continue to
build kluges on top of Mhonarc, though. (I tried to get Abhijit
Menon-Sen interested in exploring the idea of using Archivopteryx to
drive our archives, but he seems to have even less time for
experimentation with such things than I do.)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-06-18 15:01:34 | Re: Archived-At message header |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-06-18 14:06:37 | Re: Archived-At message header |