| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Archived-At message header |
| Date: | 2008-06-18 14:06:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20080618140636.GF433@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Can't we do this already, since our archives can be accessed by messageid?
We do, approximately. The cool trick about this is that it's a
_message_ header, so it actually comes with the message. The RFC
includes a pointer to w3c code that will generate these headers on the
way by based on Message-ID, yes.
I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
thread back up. Maybe it's a dumb idea, though. (Nobody would accuse
me of never having dumb ideas in public.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-06-18 14:20:04 | Re: Archived-At message header |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-06-18 14:01:36 | Re: Archived-At message header |