Re: Archived-At message header

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Archived-At message header
Date: 2008-06-18 14:06:37
Message-ID: 20080618140636.GF433@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Can't we do this already, since our archives can be accessed by messageid?

We do, approximately. The cool trick about this is that it's a
_message_ header, so it actually comes with the message. The RFC
includes a pointer to w3c code that will generate these headers on the
way by based on Message-ID, yes.

I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
thread back up. Maybe it's a dumb idea, though. (Nobody would accuse
me of never having dumb ideas in public.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-06-18 14:20:04 Re: Archived-At message header
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-06-18 14:01:36 Re: Archived-At message header