From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-05-30 22:51:57 |
Message-ID: | 200805301551.58092.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Andrew,
> Sure there's a price to pay. But that doesn't mean the facility doesn't
> exist. And I rather suspect that most of Josh's customers aren't too
> concerned about traffic charges or affected by such bandwidth
> restrictions. Certainly, none of my clients are, and they aren't in the
> giant class. Shipping a 16Mb file, particularly if compressed, every
> minute or so, is not such a huge problem for a great many commercial
> users, and even many domestic users.
The issue is that when you're talking about telecommunications companies
(and similar) once a minute isn't adequate. Those folks want at least
every second, or even better synchronous.
Anyway, this is a pretty pointless discussion given that we want both
capabilities, and stuff will get implemented in the order it makes
technical sense.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-31 00:00:17 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2008-05-30 22:47:19 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-30 23:23:03 | Re: move hash_any from hash to utils |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2008-05-30 22:47:19 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |