Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-05-31 00:00:17
Message-ID: 1212192017.12052.26.camel@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 02:48 +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:

>
> Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail
> ( http://www.2ndquadrant.com/replication.htm ), which got lost
> in the giant March commitfest queue but should probably wander
> into contrib as part of 8.4.
>
> This means we need to modify pg_standby to not check for filesize when
> reading XLogs.
>
> Best regards,
>

It does.

Joshua D. Drake

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-05-31 00:56:19 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-05-30 22:51:57 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-05-31 00:34:38 Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-05-30 23:23:03 Re: move hash_any from hash to utils