| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 02:26:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200804090226.m392QbO14282@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Are you suggesting we just delete the threads and let them die if they
> > don't submit a new version?
> >
> >
>
> My understanding was that all items in a commit-fest have one of these
> three dispositions:
>
> . committed
> . rejected
> . referred back to author for more work
>
> We're really only interested in the third one here, and so, yes, the
> ball should be in the author's court, not yours. I don't see any reason
> for you to move items from one queue to another like that. It just looks
> like it's making work.
True. I could move the emails back to my private mailbox and just track
them there too. I moved them so it would be visible we were waiting for
some people.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-09 02:29:26 | Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-09 02:25:17 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2008-04-09 02:36:40 | Re: Concurrent psql API |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-09 02:25:17 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |