From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Commit fest queue |
Date: | 2008-04-09 02:29:26 |
Message-ID: | 20080408192926.3d3cafe4@jd-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom lane said over on the concurrent psql thread:
If we do split them then there is going to be some added effort to
maintain the commit fest queue. Bruce has made it pretty clear
that he doesn't want to put in any extra cycles here. So someone
else has to step up to the plate if this is going to work.
Any volunteers out there?
What exactly are we talking about here? It sounds to me as if my
tracman email with modification might work for this. If not, o.k. but
it seems to fit.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00324.php
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2008-04-09 02:36:40 | Re: Concurrent psql API |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-09 02:26:37 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |