From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |
Date: | 2008-03-14 21:26:26 |
Message-ID: | 200803142226.27678.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter if this was a concern for you, I wish you would have brought it
> up sooner... We have:
>
> pgsql-fr-generale
> pgsql-ru-general
> pgsql-tr-genel
> pgsql-eu-general
> pgsql-it-generale
>
> and now we are requesting pgsql-us-general.
>
> So either they are all mistakes, or?
The language-coded lists are catch-alls for PostgreSQL-related things in that
language. That is presumably because there is not enough traffic to have
more specifically themed lists. Therefore, the naming is appropriate. The
mission of pgsql-eu-general is unclear to me at this point, so I cannot
comment.
The proposed purpose of pgsql-us-general is, however, not a catch-all list for
discussions about PostgreSQL in the USA. I was told that it is specifically
intended for matters of the USPA. A more accurate mailing list title would
be to everyone's benefit, so you don't get useless and off-topic traffic.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-14 21:28:19 | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-03-14 21:13:44 | Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association |